Scartch my back, I will stab you in the back .....

Today, the zionists are washing their hands with the American people innocence. Tomorrow, they will return the favor....
They will spy on Americans, steal their technology, and kill their loved ones.

Yah, that's how you return the favor....
Wake up America.

The same old Terrorism....Let's define it.

The world should know that killing innocent civilians, woman, children and elders is terrorism itself. Destroying infrastructures is terrorism itself and in its worst face.
Those Zionist (Nazis) officials can announce whatever they want and define terrorism in whatever suit their needs, but the world should and already know that what they are doing now is terrorism in its worst form.
If they call firing rockets at civilians a terror, what do they call dropping bombs and firing rockets and missiles at civilians? Defense ?
Let the world know and especially those delusional, that no action without reaction....
As of today we have a much wide spread and popular media, people are watching the acts of those zionists and their crimes, there are more people who are witnessing these crimes and building hatred to such regime that has no ethics nor value.
The pictures the new generations are watching on the net and tvs are a reflection of a true terror. Unfortunately, it builds nothing but resentment to such regime and the people who live silent behind such regime.
Regardless of whatever the zionist regime announces and launch its propaganda to present their innocence, the fact that the pictures and the activities we are witnessing are much stronger to build that hate toward such Nazis.

So which country has more UNSC Resolutions against it and still in violation of just about any law you can think of?

Pertinent United Nations Security Council Resolutions Since 1967 As They Relate to Israel

No.	Date	Substance / Summary of Content
233	6 June 1967	Calls for an immediate cease-fire and cessation of all military activities.
234	7 June 1967	Demands a cease-fire.
237	14 June 1967	Calls upon the Government of Israel to ensure the safety, welfare and security of the inhabitants, facilitate the return of those inhabitants who have fled the areas since the outbreak of the hostilities and recommends the scrupulous respect of the humanitarian principles contained in the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949.
242	22 Nov 1967	Affirms that the fulfillment of Charter principles requires the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East which should include: withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict; and termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgement of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force.
248	24 Mar 1968	Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property. Condemns the military action launched by Israel in flagrant violation of the U.N. Charter and the cease-fire resolution. Calls upon Israel to desist from acts or activities in contravention of resolution 237 (1967). (This was an attack against Karameh, Jordan.)
250	27 Apr 1968	Calls upon Israel to refrain from holding the military parade in Jerusalem which is contemplated for 2 May 1968.
251	2 May 1968	Deeply deplores the holding by Israel of the military parade in Jerusalem on 2 May 1968 in disregard of the unanimous decision adopted by the Council on 27 April 1968.
252	21 May 1968	Deplores the failure of Israel to comply with General Assembly resolutions 2253 (ES-V) and 2254 (ES-V) of 4 and 14 July 1967. Considers that all legislative and administrative measures taken by Israel, including the expropriation of land and properties thereon, which tend to change the legal status of Jerusalem, are invalid and cannot change the status. Urgently calls upon Israel to rescind all such measures taken and to desist from further actions changing the status of Jerusalem.
259	27 Sept 1968	Deplores the delay in implementation of resolution 237 (1967) because of the conditions still being set by Israel for receiving a Special Representative of the Secretary-General. Requests the Secretary-General to urgently dispatch a Special Representative to the Arab territories under military occupation by Israel following the hostilities of 5 June 1967 and to report on the implementation of resolution 237 (1967).
267	3 Jul 1969	Reaffirms the established principle that the acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible. Deplores the failure of Israel to show any regard for the resolutions of the General Assembly and the Security Council. Censures in the strongest terms all measures taken to change the status of the city of Jerusalem. Urgently calls once more on Israel to rescind all measures taken by it to change the status of Jerusalem and in the future to refrain from all actions likely to have such an effect
271	15 Sep 1969	Grieved at the extensive damage caused by arson to the Holy Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem on 21 August 1969 under the military occupation of Israel; calls upon Israel to scrupulously observe the provisions of the Geneva Conventions and international law governing military occupation.
298	25 Sep 1971	Deplores the failure of Israel to respect previous U.N. resolutions concerning measures and actions by Israel purporting to affect the status of the city of Jerusalem. Confirms that all legislative and administrative actions taken by Israel … are totally invalid and cannot change that status. Urgently calls upon Israel to rescind all such measures….
338	22 Oct 1973	Calls for an immediate cease-fire and termination of all military activity. Calls upon the parties concerned to start immediately after the cease-fire the implementation of Security Council resolution 242 (1967) in all of its parts....
339	23 Oct 1973	Refers to resolution 338 (1973); confirms its decision on immediate cessation of all military actions; and requests the Secretary-General to take measures for immediate dispatch of U.N. observers to supervise observance of the cease-fire.
381	30 Nov 1975	Expresses concern over the continued state of tension in the area. Decides to reconvene on 12 January 1976 to continue the debate on the Middle East problem including the Palestinian question, taking into account all relevant U.N. resolutions.
425	19 Mar 978	Calls for the strict respect for the territorial integrity, sovereignty and political independence of Lebanon. Calls upon Israel immediately to cease its military action against Lebanese territorial integrity and withdraw forthwith its forces from all Lebanese territory. Decides to establish immediately under its authority a United Nations Interim Force in Southern Lebanon (UNIFIL).
446	22 Mar 1979	Determines that the policy and practices of Israel in establishing settlements in the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967 have no legal validity and constitute a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East. Calls once more upon Israel, as the occupying power, to abide scrupulously by the 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention, to rescind its previous measures and to desist from taking any action which would result in changing the legal status and geographical nature and materially affecting the demographic composition of the Arab territories occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem, and in particular, not to transfer parts of its own civilian population into the occupied Arab territories.
452	20 Jul 1979	Calls upon the government and people of Israel to cease, on an urgent basis, the establishment, construction and planning of settlements in the Arab territories occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem.
465	1 Mar 1980	Determines that all measures taken by Israel to change the physical character, composition, institutional structure or status of the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem, or any part thereof, have no legal validity and that Israel's policy and practices of settling parts of its population and new immigrants in those territories constitute a flagrant violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention and also constitute a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East. Strongly deplores the continuation and persistence of Israel in pursuing those policies and practices. Calls upon the government and people of Israel to rescind those measures, to dismantle the existing settlements and in particular to cease, on an urgent basis, the establishment, construction and planning of settlements in the Arab territories occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem. Calls upon all States not to provide Israel with any assistance to be used specifically in connection with settlements in the occupied territories; and requests the Commission to continue examining the situation relating to settlements, to investigate the reported serious depletion of natural resources, particularly water, with a view to ensuring protection of those important natural resources of the territories under occupation.
468	8 May 1980	Recalling the Geneva Convention of 1949 and expressing deep concern at the expulsion by the Israeli military occupation authorities of the Mayors of Hebron and Halhoul and of the Sharia Judge of Hebron, calls upon Israel as occupying Power to rescind these illegal measures and to facilitate the immediate return of the expelled Palestinian leaders.
469	20 May 1980	Strongly deplores the failure of Israel to implement resolution 468 (1968). Calls again upon the Government of Israel, as occupying Power, to rescind the illegal measures taken by the Israeli military occupation authorities in expelling the Mayors of Hebron and Halhoul and the Sharia Judge of Hebron.
471	5 June 1980	Expresses deep concern that the Jewish settlers in the occupied Arab territories are allowed to carry arms thus enabling them to perpetrate crimes against the civilian population. Calls for the immediate apprehension and prosecution of the perpetrators of these crimes and condemns the assassination attempts on the lives of the Mayors of Nablus, Ramallah and Al-Bireh. Expresses deep concern that Israel, as occupying Power, has failed to provide adequate protection to the civilian population in the occupied territories in conformity with the provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention. Calls again upon the Government of Israel to respect and comply with the provisions of the Convention as well as with the resolutions of the Council, calls once again upon all States not to provide Israel with any assistance to be used specifically in connection with settlements in the occupied territories. Reaffirms the overriding necessity to end the prolonged occupation of Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem.
476	30 June 1980	Reaffirms the overriding necessity to end the prolonged occupation of Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem. Strongly deplores the continued refusal of Israel, the occupying Power, to comply with the relevant resolutions of the Security Council and the General Assembly. Reiterates that all measures taken by Israel which have altered the geographic, demographic and historical character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem are null and void and must be rescinded in compliance with the relevant resolutions of the Security Council. Reaffirms that all such measures and actions constitute a flagrant violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention. Reaffirms its determination in the event of non-compliance by Israel to examine practical ways and means in accordance with relevant provisions of the U.N. Charter to secure full implementation of this resolution.
478	20 Aug 1980	Censures in the strongest terms the enactment by Israel of the "basic law" on Jerusalem and the refusal to comply with relevant Security Council resolutions. Affirms that the enactment of the "basic law" by Israel constitutes a violation of international law and does not affect the continued application of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 12 August 1949 in the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since June 1967, including Jerusalem. Determines that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, which have altered or purport to alter the character and the status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, and in particular, the recent "basic law" on Jerusalem, are null and void and must be rescinded forthwith. Decides not to recognize the "basic law" and such other actions by Israel that, as a result of this law, seek to alter the character and status of Jerusalem. Calls upon all members of the United Nations (a) to accept this decision, (b) and upon those States that have established diplomatic Missions in Jerusalem to withdraw such Missions from the Holy City.
484	19 Dec 1980	Expressing grave concern at the expulsion by Israel of the Mayor of Hebron and the Mayor of Halhoul, calls upon Israel, the occupying Power, to adhere to the provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention. Declares it imperative that they be enabled to return to their homes and resume their responsibilities.
508	5 June 1982	Calls upon the parties to the conflict to cease immediately and simultaneously all military activities within Lebanon and across the Lebanese-Israeli border. Requests all Member States which are in a position to do so to bring their influence to bear upon those concerned so that the cessation of hostilities declared by Security Council resolution 490 (1981) can be respected. (Beginning of the Israeli invasion of Lebanon.)
509	6 June 1982	Demands that Israel withdraw all its military forces forthwith and unconditionally to the internationally recognized boundaries of Lebanon and demands that all parties observe strictly the terms of paragraph 1 of resolution 508 (1982).
512	19 June 1982	Expressing deep concern at the suffering of the Lebanese and Palestinian civilian populations, calls upon all the parties to the conflict to respect the rights of the civilian populations, to refrain from all acts of violence against those populations and to take all appropriate measures to alleviate the suffering caused by the conflict.
513	4 Jul 1982	Expressing alarm at the continued sufferings of the Lebanese and Palestinian civilian populations in southern Lebanon and in west Beirut, calls for respect for the rights of the civilian populations without any discrimination and repudiates all acts of violence against those populations. Calls further for the restoration of the normal supply of vital facilities such as water, electricity, food and medical provisions, particularly in Beirut.
515	29 Jul 1982	Demands that the government of Israel lift immediately the blockade of the city of Beirut in order to permit the dispatch of supplies to meet the urgent needs of the civilian population.
516	1 Aug 1982	Confirms its previous resolutions and authorizes the Secretary-General to deploy immediately, on the request of the Government of Lebanon, U.N. observers to monitor the situation in and around Beirut.
517	4 Aug 1982	Confirms once again its demand for an immediate cease-fire and withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon. Censures Israel for its failure to comply with the above resolutions. Takes note of the decision of the Palestine Liberation Organization to move the Palestinian armed forces from Beirut and authorizes the Secretary-General to increase the number of U.N. observers in and around Beirut.
518	12 Aug 1982	Demands that Israel and all parties to the conflict observe strictly the terms of Security Council resolutions relevant to the immediate cessation of all military activities within Lebanon and, particularly, in and around Beirut. Demands the immediate lifting of all restrictions on the city of Beirut
520	17 Sep 1982	Condemns the recent Israeli incursions into Beirut in violation of the cease-fire agreements and of Security Council resolutions. Demands an immediate return to the positions occupied by Israel before 15 September 1982, as a first step towards the full implementation of Security Council resolutions.
521	19 Sep 1982	Condemns the criminal massacre of Palestinian civilians in Beirut; reaffirms its resolutions 512 (1982) and 513 (1982), which call for respect for the rights of the civilian populations without any discrimination, and repudiates all acts of violence against those populations. Requests the Secretary-General, as a matter of urgency, to initiate appropriate consultations and, in particular, consultations with the Government of Lebanon on additional steps which the Security Council might take, including the possible deployment of United Nations forces, to assist that government in ensuring full protection for the civilian populations in and around Beirut. (Massacre of Sabra and Shattilla refugee camps while eastern Beirut was under Israeli military occupation.)
573	4 Oct 1985	Condemns vigorously the act of armed aggression perpetrated by Israel against Tunisian territory in flagrant violation of the U.N. Charter, international law and norms of conduct; and demands that Israel refrain from perpetrating such acts of aggression or from threatening to do so. (Israeli raid against PLO Headquarters in Hammam Al-Shut)
592	8 Dec 1986	Strongly deplores the opening of fire by the Israeli army resulting in the death and the wounding of defenseless students at Bir Zeit University. Calls upon Israel to abide immediately and scrupulously by the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949. Calls upon Israel to release any person or persons detained as a result of the recent events at Bir Zeit University.
605	22 Dec 1987	Strongly deplores those policies and practices of Israel, the occupying Power, which violate the human rights of the Palestinian people in the occupied territories, particularly the opening of fire by the Israeli army, resulting in the killing and wounding of defenseless Palestinian civilians. Calls once again upon Israel, the occupying Power, to abide immediately and scrupulously by the Fourth Geneva Convention.
607	5 Jan 1988	Calls upon Israel to refrain from deporting any Palestinian civilians from the occupied territories; and strongly requests it to abide by its obligations arising from the Fourth Geneva Convention.
608	14 Jan 1988	Reaffirming resolution 607 (1988) of 5 January 1988, deeply regrets that Israel, the occupying Power, in defiance of U.N. resolutions, has deported Palestinian civilians. Calls upon Israel to rescind the orders and to desist from forthwith deporting any other Palestinian civilians from the occupied territories.
611	25 Apr 1988	Having noted with concern that the aggression perpetrated on 16 April 1988 in the locality of Sidi Bou Said (Tunisia) has caused loss of human life, particularly the assassination of Mr. Khalil Al-Wazir, condemns vigorously the aggression perpetrated against the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Tunisia in flagrant violation of the U.N. Charter; and urges Member States to take measures to prevent such acts against the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all States. (Al-Wazir (Abu-Jihad) was the Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Palestine Liberation Organization.)
636	6 Jul 1989	Deeply regrets the continuing deportation by Israel, the occupying Power, of Palestinian civilians. Calls upon Israel to ensure the safe and immediate return to the occupied Palestinian territories of those deported and to desist forthwith from deporting any other Palestinian civilians. Reaffirms that the Fourth Geneva Convention is applicable to the Palestinian territories, occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem, and to the other occupied Arab territories.
641	30 Aug 1989	Deplores Israel's continuing deportation of Palestinian civilians. Calls upon Israel to ensure the safe and immediate return to the occupied Palestinian territories of those deported and to desist forthwith from deporting any other Palestinian civilians. Reaffirms that the Fourth Geneva Convention is applicable to the Palestinian territories, occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem, and to the other occupied Arab territories.
672	12 Oct 1990	Reaffirming that a just and lasting solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict must be based on its resolutions 242 (1967) and 338 (1973) through an active negotiating process which takes into account the right to security for all States in the region, including Israel, as well as the legitimate political rights of the Palestinian people. Expresses alarm at the violence which took place on 8 October at Al-Haram Al-Sharif and other Holy Places of Jerusalem, resulting in over twenty Palestinian deaths and the injury of more than one hundred and fifty people, including Palestinian civilians and innocent worshippers. Condemns especially the acts of violence committed by the Israeli security forces, resulting in injuries and loss of human life. Calls upon Israel, the occupying Power, to abide scrupulously by its legal obligations under the Fourth Geneva Convention.
673	24 Oct 1990	Deplores the refusal of the Israeli Government to receive the mission of the Secretary-General to the region in violation of resolution 672 (1990).
681	20 Dec 1990	Expresses its grave concern over the rejection by Israel of its resolutions 672 (1990) and 673 (1990). Deplores the decision by the Government of Israel, the occupying Power, to resume the deportation of Palestinian civilians in the occupied territories. Urges the Government of Israel to accept the de jure applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention to all the territories occupied by Israel since 1967
694	24 May 1991	Declares that the action of the Israeli authorities of deporting four Palestinians on 18 May is in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which is applicable to all the Palestinian territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem. Deplores this action and reiterates that Israel refrain from deporting any Palestinian civilian from the occupied territories and ensure the safe and immediate return of all those deported.
726	6 Jan 1992	Strongly condemns the decision of Israel, the occupying Power, to resume deportation of Palestinian civilians. Reaffirms the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 to all the Palestinian territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem. Requests Israel to ensure the safe and immediate return of all those deported.
799	18 Dec 1992	Strongly condemns the action taken by Israel, the occupying Power, to deport hundreds of Palestinian civilians (on 17 December 1992). Expresses its firm opposition to any such deportations by Israel. Reaffirms the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention to all the Palestinian territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem. Demands that Israel ensure the safe and immediate return to the occupied territories of all those deported.
904	18 Mar 1994	Strongly condemns the massacre in Hebron committed against Palestinian worshippers in Al-Ibrahimi Mosque, on 25 February 1994, during the holy month of Ramadan, and its aftermath which took the lives of more than 50 Palestinian civilians and injured several hundred others. Calls upon Israel, the occupying Power, to continue to take and implement measures, including, inter alia, confiscation of arms, with the aim of preventing illegal acts of violence by Israeli settlers. Calls for measures to be taken to guarantee the safety and protection of the Palestinian civilians throughout the occupied territory, including, inter alia, a temporary international or foreign presence, which was provided for in the Declaration of Principles, within the context of the ongoing peace process.
1073	28 Sep 1996	Expresses its deep concern about the tragic events in Jerusalem and the areas of Nablus, Ramallah, Bethlehem and the Gaza Strip, which resulted in a high number of deaths and injuries among the Palestinian civilians. Calls for the immediate cessation and reversal of all acts which have resulted in the aggravation of the situation and which have negative implications for the Middle East peace process. Calls for the safety and protection of Palestinian civilians to be ensured. Calls for the immediate resumption of negotiations within the Middle East peace process on its agreed basis and the timely implementation of the agreements reached. (The draft resolution was issued officially as a presidential text, which normally indicates unanimity prior to the vote.)
1322	7 Oct 2000	Reaffirms that a just and lasting solution to the Arab and Israeli conflict must be based on its resolutions 242 (1967) of 22 November 1967 and 338 (1973) of 22 October 1973, through an active negotiating process. Deplores the provocation carried out at Al-Haram Al-Sharif in Jerusalem on 28 September 2000, and the subsequent violence there and at other Holy Places, as well as in other areas throughout the territories occupied by Israel since 1968, resulting in over 80 Palestinian deaths and many other casualties. Condemns acts of violence, especially the excessive use of force against Palestinians, resulting in injury and loss of human life. Calls upon Israel, the occupying Power, to abide scrupulously by its legal obligations and its responsibilities under the Fourth Geneva. Calls for the immediate cessation of violence, and for all necessary steps to be taken to ensure that violence ceases, that new provocative actions are avoided, and that the situation returns to normality. Stresses the importance of establishing a mechanism for a speedy and objective inquiry into the tragic events of the last few days with the aim of preventing their repetition.

The Terror Continues

Day to day, those who want the world to think they are the victims, are getting discovered and the true is coming out every day.

Not sure how long you will be hiding behind the old story of the Holocaust, but this is become an old crying wolf story.

The Truth will prevail.

those who claim were obressed, now obressing others.....

When are you going to get it....
Listen to the truth.....

for windoes media :http://wamu.org/audio/nw/08/07/n6080718-22037.asx
for real audio: http://wamu.org/audio/nw/08/07/n6080718-22037.ram

To America

The hearts are bleeding and the souls are reeling, and we say nothing but what pleases our Lord.
We all feel the sadness and sorrow for what hit us lately, but we can not let evil wins in any way.

Since the tragedy, we have been hearing about so many measures to protect and secure us from another act of terrorism. Since this is not the first time nor the second....I really lost count how many times innocent Americans have been attacked and killed. One can not help but wonder; the question I have yet to hear from the media or our own government or our fellow Americans:
Why do people hate America and American? Why do these people keep on trying to hurt us? What would possibly have we done to these people to commit such acts?


In spite of what the media, and even our own government is telling us, this
act was not committed by a group of mentally deranged fanatics. To dismiss
them as such would be among the gravest of mistakes.
This attack was committed by an intelligent and dedicated adversary.
Don't misunderstand me, I don't admire these people and I deplore their tactics,
but I respect their capabilities. And I think we should bring these bastard to justice. I know they will be facing their maker one day and judged, but we have to stop them from hurting more people if we can.

The media and the government have been bombarding us with speculations, ideas, thoughts and fantasies on how they think the revenge should be. To prepare us, we keep hearing how monistereous those people are, their capabilities, the chemical and nuclear warfare these people may wage on us.
I like you to read the following headlines we have been hearing since that sad day:

Bush Plans New Air Security Steps
New Debate Over Sweeping Anti-Terror Proposals
President Bush introduced measures to tighten airline security and urged governors to call on the National Guard to protect U.S. airports
Tragic Power: Generals Permitted to Order Shoot-Down of Civilian Jets
Peace Dividend Lost: Taken For Granted, Investors Now Factoring Risk Of Buying American
Protecting Americans and American Liberties: New Debate Over Sweeping Anti-Terror Proposals
The Air We Breathe: Pros and Cons of Getting a Gas Mask

AFGHANISTAN AND OSAMA BIN LADEN
Who Did It? FBI Links Names to Terror Attacks

A Private Terrorist: Osama bin Laden: Folk Hero, Pariah, Bankroller of Terrorist Training Camps

Afghanistan: A Nation Turns its Back on Modernity Under Fundamentalist Taliban

Terror Manual: Experts Say Info Obtained by U.S. Intelligence Is Creepy, But Pretty Basic

Ghosts of the Past: Filipino Muslim Rebels Tied to Afghan War

Considering the Unthinkable: Are Terrorists Capable of a Biological or Chemical Attack? Is the U.S. Ready?

Secret Codes: Authorities Say Bin Laden Using Encryption Software

Tech-Savvy Terrorists: Experts: Bin Laden Had Tech Know-How

From Lo-Tech to No-Tech: Foiling U.S. Technology, Bin Laden Relies on Little Technology to Communicate

These kind of headlines are nothing but fuel to make everyone wanted to hit something or kill someone.

By the time we settle this matter the way the government wanted to, we have spent billions and billions of dollars, thousands of our resources, and may be hundreds of lives. There is a solution that cost us nothing, literally nothing and give us peace and rest. As a matter of fact, we will have billions and billions of dollars saved and diverted to much needed projects.
If the United States government would denounce it's unjust and biased support to the Zionist government, we will all live in peace.
As much as this sound simple, but it's real.
I challenge any person, media network, newspaper or radio network to run a survey and ask Arabs, Muslims, Christians in the Middle East on what they think would bring peace to America and their lives.


Taking out the evil is essential, but for America to go out and do the same thing that those caused us such harm makes us nothing less than they are. Especially when we hurt more innocent people.
If it was Bin Laden and his network behind such an evil act, do you think taking them out will take care of the problem? We have been down this path many times, before we even heard of Bin Laden.

These men hate the United States with all of their being, and we must not
underestimate the power of their moral commitment. Napoleon, perhaps the
world's greatest combination of soldier and statesman, stated "the moral is
to the physical as three is to one." Patton thought the Frenchman
underestimated its importance and said moral conviction was five times more
important in battle than physical strength. Our enemies are willing -
better said anxious-to give their lives for their cause. How committed are
we America? And for how long?
American people and the US government should look into this incident as a wake up call. We need to find out why these people are so committed to their cause.

As a career soldier and a student and teacher of military history, I have a
different perspective and I think you should hear it. This war will be won
by the American citizens, not diplomats, politicians or soldiers.
Let me briefly explain.

For the last forty years, the united states has been targeted by many groups. These groups seems to have a common goal for their cause. Palestine !
They do not seems to hate America for what is America and what American stand for. They hate what we do to them and our policy. We need to take a look and reevaluate our policy in the middle east.
Let me refresh your memory on something very recent not from the old past. On many occasions, in interviews or broadcasts, Bin Laden always associate Israel with the US. And the same we have heard from other groups in the past.
These people hate our policy and biased support to Israel. We send our money ( $ 3 billion dollar) every year. We send our weapons, technology and intelligence so the Israelis kick Palestinians out of their homes, confiscate their lands, close their schools and kill their children. These news that have been hidden from us for over 40 years. It was always painted to us as the Palestinians are the terrorists.
We see them on tv as suicidal for their cause. There is nothing would make a normal person wanted to die for something do not believe in.
These people are desperate and have no expectations in life. They have nothing to live for.

Make no mistake, taking out Bin Laden and his network is not enough. We need to start make peace with the middle eastern countries and begin just mediation to install peace in Palestine.

For over 50 years, the Israelis dragged America to fight their dirty war, pay for it and even getting paid generously.



I see history repeating itself.......
Here is a portion of a speech Benjamin H. Freedman given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde
McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense.



"Here in the United States, the Zionists and their
co-religionists have complete control of our government. For
many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this
time, the Zionists and their co- religionists rule these
United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of
this country. Now you may say that is a very broad statement,
but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep.

What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914.
There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that
war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and
Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and
Turkey.

Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it
nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which
were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from
the Atlantic Ocean. Great Britain stood there without
ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply --
and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had
mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth
in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was
defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home,
they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the
Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.

Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy
soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, Germany
was offering England peace terms. They offered England a
negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante
basis. That means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything
be as it was before the war started." England, in the summer
of 1916 was considering that -- seriously. They had no choice.
It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was
magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and
being totally defeated.

While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who
represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the
British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because it's
a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any
statement that I make -- they said: "Look here. You can yet
win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to
accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You
can win this war if the United States will come in as your
ally." The United States was not in the war at that time. We
were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful.
They told England: "We will guarantee to bring the United
States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your
side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war."
In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United
States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is
Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany,
Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to
promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have
to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's
absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that never had any
connection or any interest or any right in what is known as
Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the
Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However,
they did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly
after that -- I don't know how many here remember it - - the
United States, which was almost totally pro-German, entered
the war as Britain's ally."

As you see my fellow American, we are dragged into this unjust war because we are nice people. We dip into our pocket quickly, open our homes and hearts easily to any one.
When the world stands in sympathy for the Palestinian cause, we walk out.
When the United Nations issued a resolution for the sake of the Palastinians as the right thing to do, we use VETO.
When the Palestinians fight for their lives, homes and lands, we call them terrorist, but when we kill them with our money and weapons, we do it for humanitarian and noble cause.
Our government that makes decisions on our behalf is driven and influenced by the Israelis lobbyists. They keep the government scared of this big monster that wanted to change our way of life, attack our freedom and hate our democracy !

This monster is nothing but a fantasy that was created for us.
My fellow American, look and see who is running the united states today.
Why we have so much interests in Israel? Because of the Israelis lobby infested Capitol hallways and every administration offices.
Who owns most of the tv networks and stations, newspapers, radio networks and stations. See for yourself.

I have attached to the bottom of this note the rest of Benjamin H. Freedman's speech to think for yourself.

One thing I like to leave you with, that taking care of the symptoms does not alleviate the problem. We need to take of the problem from the root.
God Bless America...................................

Benjamin H. Freedman
"I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German
because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the
bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in
this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were
pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come
from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the
Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want
Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn
Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States
refused to finance France or England to the extent of one
dollar. They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and
England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they
poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany against
Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.

Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting
Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that
time, everything changed, like a traffic light that changes
from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all
pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the
difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain
commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the
Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They
were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies'
hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson
declared war on Germany.

The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States,
to Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson.
We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on
President Wilson and get the United States into the war."
That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more
interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have
to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room. There was
absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war. We were
railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into
-- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could
obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the
United States have never been told. They never knew why we
went into World War I.

After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain
and they said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement.
Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going
to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the
war." They didn't know whether the war would last another year
or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt.
The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in
very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know
what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour
Declaration.

The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to
pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration
for getting the United States into the war. So this great
Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as
phony as a three dollar bill. I don't think I could make it
more emphatic than that.

That is where all the trouble started. The United States got
in the war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what
happened. When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris
for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews
there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by
Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know. Now what
happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were
cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these
nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European
territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they
produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans,
this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time
realized, "Oh, so that was the game! That's why the United
States came into the war." The Germans for the first time
realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific
reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists
wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost.

That brings us to another very interesting point. When the
Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that
time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the
world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau
there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and
finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr.
Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German
Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr.
Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family.
You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant
bankers -- the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very
well in Germany. No question about that. The Germans felt:
"Well, that was quite a sellout."

It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical
situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the
Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet
Union: "Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's
forget the whole thing." And all of a sudden Red China came
into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them
into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with
reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot
encompass. Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out
that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens,
who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working
with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it
was through them that Red China was brought into the war
against us. How would we feel, then, in the United States
against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would dare
show his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough
convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we
would feel.

Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd
been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist
revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out
of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them
refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they had
sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than
the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-called "Jewish
commonwealth."

Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names
that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919,
1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers -- and
the press was filled with their statements -- that the feeling
against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they
realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish
intercession in bringing the United States into the war. The
Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in
1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better
than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious
feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on
account of their religious belief. It was all political. It
was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in
Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and
said "Shema' Yisroel" or "Our Father." Nobody cared in Germany
any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling
that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the
Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat.

And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason
for which Germany was responsible. They were guilty of
nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy.
They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany at
the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small
city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three
hundred separate little political entities. And between that
time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were
consolidated into one state. And within 50 years they became
one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great
Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they
could undersell anybody, they could make better products. What
happened as a result of that?

There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to
slap down Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who
can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to
wipe Germany off the map politically.

When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her
defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head
of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill,
of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret
papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted
from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a
Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate
the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back
that he found them in very fine condition. They were in
excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were
filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because
the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the
Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests
there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and
others who had international affiliations.

Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took
over Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl
Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government
for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled
to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to
take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to
meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for
safety, for security. After the Communist threat in Germany
was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back
into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every
way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone's head.

They fought them the same way that, in this country, the
Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor.
They didn't fight one another with pistols. Well, that's the
way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time,
mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were
only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent of the
population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all
the press, and they controlled most of the economy because
they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued
and bought up practically everything.

The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want
the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany,
and that the Germans resented that.

The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They,
shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could.
They shunned them. The same way that we would shun the
Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this
country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our
defeat.

After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in
Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended this
meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire
Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position,
whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can't
treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving
an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what the Germans told
them. So what did the Jews do?

In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world
conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and
Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American
delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to
the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of
the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast
throughout the United States in which he in effect said, "The
Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We
are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And
we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to
use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them
because they are dependent upon their export business." And it
is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be
imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of
what they exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds
of Germany's population would have to starve. There was just
not enough food for more than one third of the population. Now
in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed
in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer
boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of
self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the
National Recovery Administration," which some of you may
remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he
followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was
declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time.
Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against
Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one
thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "made
in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth
Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars
worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores
were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made
in Germany," they were picketed with signs saying "Hitler,"
"murderer," and so forth, something like these sit-ins that
are taking place in the South. At a store belonging to the R.
H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss
who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there
which came from Chemnitz, marked "made in Germany." Well, they
were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years,
since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's
been a long time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them.
I saw Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around
with signs saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth. Now
up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been
hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no
starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.

Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare
a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and
make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do
that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they
painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German
go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a
boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to
the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their
premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.

The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938,
when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in
Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really
started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found
them then breaking windows and having street fights and so
forth.

Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's
meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have
to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in
Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World
War I and for this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were
also responsible for World War II, because after this thing
got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and
Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to
survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew
that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be
Christian or Communist: there is no in between. And the
Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if
possible. And they started to re-arm. In November 1933 the
United States recognized the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union
was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that "Our
turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same
as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to
come soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending
83 or 84 billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom?
Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over
Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of
many other countries of the world.

For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War,
from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that
staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are
measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to
describe one million tons of TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a
capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they
were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being
developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how
many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.

What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may
develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might
such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes
up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II,
Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the
Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined
that they are going to again use the United States to help
them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their
world government. That is just as true as I am standing here.
Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and
it is known all over the world.

What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's.
Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you
don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London
the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send
your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not
a person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted
to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel
House knew it. Other insiders knew it.

Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on:
I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign
when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around
the office there. I was "confidential man" to Henry
Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the finance committee,
and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer.
So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head
of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into
President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has
become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him
with the Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President
Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand.

President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came
to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. That is
how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They
sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the
Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've
fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming
or going.

Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any
witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard
all his testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but
in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If
that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.

What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you,
because they are known as Jews. I don't call them Jews myself.
I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they
are.) The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the
world's population of those people who call themselves Jews,
were originally Khazars. They were a warlike tribe who lived
deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even
the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe. They
set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the
time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European
countries. The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all
Europe -- so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs
wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000
soldiers. That's how big and powerful they were.

They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not
want to go into the details of that now. But that was their
religion, as it was also the religion of many other pagans and
barbarians elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king became so
disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided
to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith -- either
Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which
is really Talmudism. By spinning a top, and calling out "eeny,
meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism. And that
became the state religion. He sent down to the Talmudic
schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of
rabbis, and opened up synagogues and schools, and his people
became what we call Jews. There wasn't one of them who had an
ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land. Not only in Old
Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one
of them! And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to
support their armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, "You
want to help repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised
Land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your Christian
duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You
now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a
Jew, and we're Jews." But they are pagan Khazars who were
converted just the same as the Irish were converted. It is as
ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," as it would
be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems "Arabs." Mohammed
only died in 620 A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have
accepted Islam as their religious belief. Now imagine, in
China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and Mohammed's
birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million Chinese decided to call
themselves "Arabs." You would say they were lunatics. Anyone
who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be
crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief
that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the
Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in
the ocean and imported to the Holy Land a new crop of
inhabitants. They hadn't become a different people. They were
the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as a
religious faith.

These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these
Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia
into eastern Europe. Because their king took the Talmudic
faith, they had no choice in the matter. Just the same as in
Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a
Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So the Khazars
became what we call today Jews. Now imagine how silly it was
for the great Christian countries of the world to say, "We're
going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God's Chosen
People to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land."
Could there be a bigger lie than that? Because they control
the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the
book publishing business, and because they have the ministers
in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes talking the
same language, it is not too surprising that you believe that
lie. You'd believe black is white if you heard it often
enough. You wouldn't call black black anymore -- you'd start
to call black white. And nobody could blame you.

That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation
of all the misery that has befallen the world.

Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you
think is so sacred to them? I was one of them. This is not
hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give
you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a
synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you
recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat
three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that
prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any
oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve
months shall be null and void. The oath shall not be an oath;
the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge.
They shall have no force or effect. And further, the Talmud
teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you
are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the
Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them.
How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon
their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916.
We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and
for the same reason."

--------------------------------------------------------------